Tuesday, November 25, 2014

Latin American Revolutions - Why Discriminate?

In our class this week, we discussed the Latin American revolutions, and our essential question asked "Why is it essential to acknowledge human value regardless of race?" I find this to be a great essential question, as the same question can still be asked today. It's a crucial idea to think about, as without the acceptance of other people's races and ethnicities, we can't come together to be the strongest nation possible. Race discrimination dates all the way back to the Latin American Revolution, with a myriad of different labels and tags that were produced and given out to those with parents of different racial background. Because of this, the social and economic structure of Latin America at the time was bound to be in ruins, due to it's lack of acceptance of race.

   Our group had the Brazilian Revolution between 1789 and 1831. During this revolution, John VI was elected as the leader of Brazil, but was reluctantly sent back to Portugal while his son took his place. His son, Pedro, proposed a constitution that the citizens did not approve of his constitution. Pedro eventually renewed the battles between Brazil and Argentina which evolved into the Cisplatine war. Because of the widespread disapproval of his rule, Pedro abdicated his throne and returned to Portugal. Race was a key part in this revolution, since both John VI and Pedro were from Portugal and their people were of Brazilian decent.

Many Judgements are based on race today, simply because of where someone comes from or what ethnicity they were born as. This has lead to many great conflicts of people in the past and has destroyed the morals of many others as well. Recently, there has been a massive case on the Ferguson shooting, with more information in the link below.
Michael Brown Shooting
I do not believe it is important to use race as a barrier between coming together and collaborating to making a better society for those around
us and the younger generation as well. Race only holds us back as a culture and without the indelible lines drawn between ethnicities, we would be much farther as a society today.

Friday, November 21, 2014

Louverture's Legacy

Today, a strong leader has traits that drive others to success. For example, Abraham Lincoln was a strong leader due to his eloquence, his honesty, and his political skill among a myriad of other talents essential to being a strong, inspiring leader. Similarly, Toussaint used his strong skills as a military leader to establish himself as the ruler of St. Domingue. Toussaint was known as a strong military leader, the liberator of slaves, and the ruler of St. Domingue.

Toussaint should be remembered mainly as a strong military leader. His passion, military strategies, and inspiration helped to drive his people to success. Using creative military tactics, Toussaint was able to win the majority of his battles. “Toussaint gained a reputation for running an orderly camp and for training his men in both guerrilla tactics and the European shoulder to shoulder style of war." [Doc A.]. In Haiti, the terrain is not even and in fact very mountainous. Because of this, Toussaint’s soldiers had the advantage when the European troops travelled to Haiti to raid and pillage their towns. Document F states that "Toussaint and his generals at once abandoned the towns, and took themselves to the mountains, those citadels of freedom in st. Domingo, where the blacks have always proved too many much for the whites." With the mountainous terrain providing much cover to duck in and out of, Toussaint's soldiers were very familiar in terms of knowing how to navigate through them. On the contrary, Napoleon's soldiers were only used to fighting in classic, European style shoulder to shoulder warfare. This unorthodox way of fighting led to the Haitians triumph over Napoleon's troops. Prior to the attempted raiding by Napoleon's soldiers, Toussaint presented a very passionate and inspiring speech to help motivate his troops to persevere through the upcoming 2 years of war they were about to encounter. After nearly 26,000 french deaths, Napoleon eventually withdrew his soldiers from Haiti. This proves Toussaint’s legacy and remembrance as a strong military leader.

Furthermore, Toussaint should be recognized secondly as the Liberator of slaves. His strong self-establishment as a leader in St. Domingue allowed him to issue the Saint Domingue Constitution of 1801 [Doc C]. In this constitution, Toussaint states “There cannot exist slaves in this territory, servitude is therein forever abolished. All men are born, live, and die free and French.” [Doc C]. This statement alone forever banishes the concept of slavery on the island of St. Domingue. Complimenting his title as a strong military leader, Toussaint’s letter to the French Directory further shows how fearless and passionate he is about maintaining and protecting his people’s rights as free men and women. “But today when they have left it, if they had a thousand lives, they would sacrifice them all rather than be subjected again to slavery…” [Doc B]. This quote is a perfect example of Toussaint’s passive aggressive protection for his freedom. This quote essentially says that his people would rather lose their own life rather than be chained up and labeled a slave once more.
As a final point, Toussaint should lastly be remembered as the ruler of Saint Domingue. Despite being such a prominent title, it was not his most memorable trait or legacy. However, Toussaint did manage to powerfully establish himself as the ruler of St. Domingue. As mentioned above, Toussaint was single handedly able to establish an entire constitution as well as laws to restrict certain articles from their full freedom. “After having taken knowledge of the Constitution, I give it my approval… I shall pass it to the French government in order to obtain its sanction.” [Doc C]. This quote shows his complete approval and consent of the Constitution made only for Saint Domingue. Despite the Constitution granting seemingly total freedom, Toussaint’s Proclamation in 1801 established rules on top of the Constitution in order to kick start his new land. For example, “As soon as a child can walk, he should be employed on the plantation according to his strength in some useful work” [Doc D]. This quote helps to establish the minimum requirement for a child to begin working on any sort of plantation. Despite Toussaint establishing many freedoms and many rules, this was not his most prominent trait yet one of the top ways to remember Toussaint Louverture.
Although there were many ways to remember Toussaint Louverture, remembering him as a strong military leader is the most important way to remember him. Being such an inspiration to his troops, being so eloquent and being a masterful military strategist, his title as a commander in chief is nothing less than well deserved. His final stand against Napoleon’s troops proved victorious, however, he was capture and left for dead in prison by Napoleon’s soldiers. Louverture was never able to see St. Domingue become the independent island of Haiti that it is today. Toussaint’s legacy is forever remembered by those who were passed down from the times of the Haitian Revolution.

Sunday, November 9, 2014

Revolutions of 1830 and 1848 - Were they really complete failures?

In history class this week, we were discussing the true outcomes of the numerous revolutions that occurred between 1830 and 1848.  In groups, we were each assigned a revolution to research and find information on. Our group was assigned the Decembrists revolution, which was labeled as one of the few complete failures of the time. To learn more about the other revolutions, the groups were told to create online quizzes that helped us to uncover more information about the revolutions. During the quizzes, we were allowed to view the primary sources of the revolution that gave us crucial information to determine whether or not these revolutions were complete failures or not. 

Our group was assigned the Decembrist revolt. In this revolt, roughly 3000 people rose up against Tsar Nicholas I. Nicholas's views were not what the people he ruled wanted. After the predecessor Tsar Alexander I's death, the people expected his older brother, Constantine, to take his position. However, Constantine did not want the throne, Therefor putting Tsar Nicholas at the throne. To Tsar Nicholas's misfortune, the people revolted on the first day of his ruling. Seeing no other alternative to protect his throne, Nicholas I fired upon his people, killing a large majority of them. This yielded a brutal failure of a revolution.


In the end, not all of the revolutions were complete failures. On that list were the revolutions and revolts of 1848 in both Hungary and Frankfurt, and 1830 in France. In my opinion, there were very few complete failures that the Historians mentioned. Many of them were partial successes actually, with the people actually getting some things they wanted from the government. In conclusion, the revolutions of 1830 and 1848 were not all complete failures.