Slavery became economically entrenched in the sense that there were several significant figures that supported slavery and the slavery rate increased with the production of cotton as well. Cotton was an extremely valuable resource and became very popular during the early 19th century, used in the manufacturing of many clothing articles and things similar to it. Slaves were crucial to the production of cotton, and without them at the time, the united states cotton industry would collapse. Although the North wasn't directly supporting slavery, they were indirectly supporting it by using Cotton, which was produced significantly in the south by the slaves. And, since cotton was a huge part of the economy at the time, with the lack of cotton the economy would collapse.
There were several significant figures that had distinct opinions on where they stood on slavery. To name some, Frederick Douglass was an abolitionist who was once a slave. After 2 unsuccessful attempts at escaping slavery, he finally did and made it his duty to speak out against it. However, on the other hand there was a man named George Fitzhugh. George Fitzhugh was widely criticized for his support of slavery, and his belief that slavery was multicolored and determined simply by one's color, strength, and ethnicity.
![]() |
| Abolitionist Frederick Douglass's Take on the Celebration of July 4th |
All of these systems of slavery seem to ignore very basic human rights and characteristics. Through slavery, many were mistreated to an extent in which would be seen as simply intolerable in today's world. Many slaves in the 19th century had families and homes that they were taken away from. I support Frederick Douglass's view on July 4th, which says that unless every single inhabitant of the United States is free, regardless of color or ethnicity, then July 4th is unfair and insignificant to a large majority of people left in the United States.
